In December 2023 Beijing Energy International agreed to buy five Australian solar farms from Lightsource bp. The headline called it 1.2 GW. The deal never closed, and the reason it failed was not the price. Look closely at the capacity figure and it was never quite what it seemed either.
Key takeaways
- Beijing Energy International Australia announced on 14 December 2023 that it would acquire a portfolio of five solar projects in Australia from Lightsource bp, with an equity consideration of $535.08 million stated in the announcement.
- Enerdatics identified that Beijing Energy failed to obtain approval from Australia's Foreign Investment Review Board, and the Lightsource bp transaction has been cancelled, according to an update to Leap's record dated 10 February 2025.
- The Lightsource bp portfolio had a generation capacity of 1.037 GWdc across five projects: Wellington North (425 MWp), Woolooga (214 MWp), Wellington South (200 MWp), West Wyalong (108 MWp) and Wunghnu (90 MWp).
- The five Lightsource bp solar projects were expected to generate about 2,224 GWh a year combined, with offtake from Snowy Hydro, XXXX Brewery, Charter Hall Group, ENGIE, Orica, Mars Australia and Boral.
- Enerdatics records 46 solar M&A transactions in Australia between January 2022 and December 2024, and the Beijing Energy deal is the only one of them logged as cancelled.
Where does the 1.2 GW figure come from?
Most likely from adding a battery to the solar. The five projects listed in Leap's record sum to 1,037 MWp of solar. The deal headline, and Leap's structured capacity field, carry 1,237 MW. The difference is exactly 200 MW, which matches the co-located Woolooga battery energy storage system under development at the portfolio's only Queensland site.
That matters for anyone measuring the deal per megawatt. A battery still in development is not generating capacity, and folding it into a single figure makes the portfolio look about a fifth larger than its operating and contracted solar base. Leap's record notes that all five projects include a plan for co-located storage, but only Woolooga's is specified.
The portfolio was also less finished than the "operational" label suggests. Woolooga reached commercial operation in December 2022, Wellington South in December 2020 and West Wyalong in January 2023. Wellington North and Wunghnu, together 515 MWp and half the solar capacity, are described in forward-looking terms, with their project debt raised only in December 2022.
What was Beijing Energy really paying for?
The equity in five project companies that already carried debt. The $535.08 million in the announcement is an equity consideration, which means it excludes the borrowing already sitting inside the projects. Leap's structured deal value field for this transaction is empty, so no enterprise value is recorded.
The debt was substantial. Lightsource bp secured a senior debt facility from ING and EDC for Wellington South in October 2019, $254 million of project finance for West Wyalong and Woolooga in June 2021, and $362 million for Wellington North and Wunghnu in December 2022. Outstanding balances at signing are not in the record, so the two figures cannot simply be added, but the equity price clearly sat on top of a large debt stack.
That is why the per-MW equity figure, about $0.52 million per MWp, should not be compared with asset deals priced on enterprise value. Enerdatics records an operating Australian solar benchmark of $1.44 million per MW for Atmos Renewables' purchase of the 90 MW Karadoc solar farm from BayWa r.e. in August 2023, and $1.42 million per MW for CleanPeak Energy's 15 MW acquisition from Maoneng in January 2023. Much of the gap between those prints and the Beijing Energy equity figure is likely to be debt rather than discount.
The record adds one more caution. The projects operated at a loss before tax in 2021 and 2022, according to the financial reports of their holding companies. The buyer expected stable returns from the operating assets; the historical accounts had not yet shown them.
What contracts came with the portfolio?
A mix of utility and corporate power purchase agreements, the long-term contracts that fix who buys a plant's output and on what terms. Wellington South sells to Snowy Hydro under a 15-year agreement at a strike price of $70 per MWh, the only price disclosed in the record. West Wyalong also has a 15-year agreement with Snowy Hydro.
The newer sites lean corporate. Woolooga has a PPA with XXXX Brewery and a seven-year short-term PPA with Charter Hall Group. Wellington North and Wunghnu have agreements with ENGIE, Orica, Mars Australia and Boral. Of the 2,224 GWh a year the portfolio was expected to generate, Wellington North alone accounts for 925 GWh.
Why did the deal collapse?
Because it needed a regulatory approval it did not get. Enerdatics identified that Beijing Energy failed to obtain approval from the Foreign Investment Review Board, the body that screens foreign acquisitions of Australian assets, and the transaction was cancelled. Completion had always been subject to conditions.
The seller was in transition at the time. Two weeks earlier, bp had agreed to buy the half of Lightsource bp it did not already own. Lightsource bp said it planned to use the sale proceeds to speed up development elsewhere in Asia-Pacific, including New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea. A cancelled sale leaves that recycling plan without its intended funding source.
Enerdatics records 46 solar M&A transactions in Australia between January 2022 and December 2024. Fifteen carry a disclosed value, and the Beijing Energy deal is the only one logged as cancelled. Among priced operating asset deals, values range from $0.66 million per MW for MPower Group's 12.2 MW solar and storage purchase in May 2022 to $1.44 million per MW at Karadoc.
What does the deal signal for Australian solar M&A?
It shows that the buyer's identity can matter more than the price. The portfolio was contracted with named offtakers, partly operating and backed by bank debt. On commercial terms it was an ordinary sale. It failed on foreign investment screening, a risk no valuation model captures.
It also shows how headline capacity can drift from the asset base. A figure that includes development-stage storage alongside operating solar is not wrong, but it is a different measure, and it changes any per-MW comparison drawn from it.
For sellers of Australian infrastructure, the lesson is about counterparties. Approval risk now belongs in the bid evaluation alongside price, and a lower offer from a buyer with a clear path through screening can be worth more than a higher one without it.
Frequently asked questions
Why was the Beijing Energy and Lightsource bp deal cancelled? Enerdatics identified that Beijing Energy failed to obtain approval from Australia's Foreign Investment Review Board, and the transaction was cancelled.
How large was the Lightsource bp portfolio? Five solar projects totalling 1.037 GWdc. The 1.2 GW headline figure appears to include the 200 MW Woolooga battery under development.
How much was Beijing Energy paying? The announcement stated an equity consideration of $535.08 million. That excludes project debt, and Leap records no structured enterprise value for the deal.
Ready to get deal-ready answers in seconds? Try Enerdatics Leap AI and access verified intelligence across M&A, financings, PPAs, projects, and energy market developments through natural language.
.jpeg)
